Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:09:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
466 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:G23324.HEu@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dylan Reardon writes:
> > I'm not sure when-abouts I inserted Dylan Bradley into the mix - • presumably
> > when signed up for the message boards.
>
> That was when, yes, according to my records.
>
>
> > That was only meant to be my "posting name" ("Alias", "Identity",
> > whatever..) - not a deception of any kind...
>
> But you said in that form that Dylan Bradley was your real-life name. I • would
> appreciate any thoughts you could offer as to how to make it clearer to • people
> that "real-life name" means real-life name and not internet posting name,
> alias, identity, etc.
Well, Todd, I don't think anything is necessary, but it's your choice.
Here's what I would suggest: Eliminate the Posting-name form - keeping only
the member form active, which is the "real-life name". That way, you'd do
away with*any* chance that a 'false', 'scandalous', 'mendacious' person(s)
could *ever* make an error like this, ever.
Sardonically,
DBR, Dylan Bradley, Dylan Reardon
--
"To infinity and beyond!"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) That was when, yes, according to my records. (...) But you said in that form that Dylan Bradley was your real-life name. I would appreciate any thoughts you could offer as to how to make it clearer to people that "real-life name" means (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
