 | | Re: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
(...) Looks great but I really miss seeing an easy link to "traffic". This is what I first click on every time I visit LUGNET. (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
|
(...) But it's an issue which comes up (naturally) from time to time -- and came up in RTL several times -- and it *IS* related to LEGO. Anything related to LEGO has a place here. On the one hand, I agree that it doesn't have a terribly big place in (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
|
(...) Always good advice! Yes! (...) IMO, no debate here deserves to die so long as people are still being calm and principled and the debate is taking place in the most appropriate group (often .off-topic.debate). The .off-topic.debate are is _for_ (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) It's often used in place of 'aggression' or 'aggressive'. Seems to fit this discussion... -Adam 8^D (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Heh. Meeee toooo. (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) What is "agro"? (...) FWIW, I haven't noticed any recent changes -- other than the usual flare-ups of debates that happen from time to time. Sometimes they seem like changes because they take things by storm, but they've been here since day 1 (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) am (...) It is very distructive, and I found that I was thinking about it all the time, and I decided to drop it. It is a healthy move, IMO. I rather discuss LEGO items more than anything. (...) but (...) won't (...) age (...) its (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:010e01c006fd$12...8d0@SES... (...) civil (...) isn't (...) a (...) Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference. Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet tensions? (was Re: defining proper content)
|
|
(...) Help me out here- I've been seeing a lot of people talking about an "increased level of tension" on Lugnet lately, but I guess I don't see it. I know there were two very controversial threads in the past week/week-and-a-half... namely, the (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) in (...) for (...) I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : ) I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good chunk of life, but I try to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
