 | | compartmentalized dorks redux —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | Hi ... I'm a compartmentalized dork ... :^) I'd be surprised if this hasn't been suggested, but why not have a lugnet.castle.marketplace, a lugnet.space.marketplace, lugnet.starwars.marketplace, etc? This is a subtly different idea than having a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | (...) I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, I think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me after all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant answer to your (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think market.theme was preffered over theme.market, but none were seen as being better than the existing setup. As user numbers increase I expect things will change... but who knows when the numbers will begin to justify that? I suppose (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on both sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people who think it would be a bad idea. More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps it's (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | (...) I (...) after (...) P. (...) both (...) who (...) I remember that. There was a lot of discussion about it. (...) The (...) calls (...) always (...) website (...) All right. My memories of this are rather foggy, I guess. This sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | | | (...) Either would be good. I could come up with advantages of either way. I have a preference for appending the .marketplace groups to the theme hierarchies for ease of reading via the web interface. On the other hand, placing them all within a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) (in unison) "Hi, Nephilim." ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) What do you *mean* there is no "lugnet.dork.compart...alized"?!? LFB (25 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Sure there is: lugnet.people.traits...p.posting. groupchoice.discrete (25 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Funny I never noticed that before!! I'd think that with the amount of compartmentalized dorks we have around here, the traffic would be amazingly high... maybe it's blocked on my skip-filter settings somehow... lemme check... ;-) -Shiri "Hi, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
