Subject:
|
Re: Clue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:37:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
381 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz wrote:
> Actually, in some ways, I don't think lugnet.general is very necessary
> any more.
Disagree. There will always be odd-ball discussions with nowhere to go but
.general.
> lugnet.history
> lugnet.parts
> lugnet.new-sets.xxxx (where xxxx is the year)
I agree with all of these. Especially if the homepage for .parts had a
crosslink to .db.inv.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clue
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <7h54ls05eh2m9ub4j24...ax.com>... (...) Well, I did say that I didn't think it was VERY necessary anymore. I guess in some ways, what I'm saying is that half the discussion in general would be better off in another (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Actually, in some ways, I don't think lugnet.general is very necessary any more. We have lugnet.build for discussing techniques. We have the theme groups for discussing things which are of primary interest to folks in a particular theme. We (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
