Subject:
|
Re: Clue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:18:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
331 times
|
| |
|
|
Shiri Dori wrote in message ...
>
> Nothing's *wrong* with either of the groups. But I would think it excessive
> xposting, because I could be posting to tons of "suitable" groups. It • seemed
> to me most appropriate in .org.cw, where Scar is well known; and off-
> topic.fun, because it's a fun thing. But I see Matthew's point, it's "off-
> topic for .off-topic". Probably lugnet.fun would be a better place. Or
> something.
It sounds like everyone has forgotten what .general is for... oh well, it
does mean that I spend less time in front of the computer.
*sigh*
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Actually, in some ways, I don't think lugnet.general is very necessary any more. We have lugnet.build for discussing techniques. We have the theme groups for discussing things which are of primary interest to folks in a particular theme. We (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Nothing's *wrong* with either of the groups. But I would think it excessive xposting, because I could be posting to tons of "suitable" groups. It seemed to me most appropriate in .org.cw, where Scar is well known; and off- topic.fun, because (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
