Subject:
|
Re: Clue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:59:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.stopspammersORG
|
Viewed:
|
347 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with .build.minifigs or .fun.gaming or .fun.activities for the
> sort of thing linked to above? Or even .general ?
Nothing, except that people -- even completely reasonable people *grin* --
seem drawn to post lego-related fun in .off-topic.fun.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clue
|
| (...) I'll take that as a compliment? <grin> Yeah, o-t.fun seems like a "natural" place for silliness and fun... it's just not really obvious that off-topic.fun is for <emphasis> OFF-TOPIC <\emphasis> fun. Because there isn't a place for on-topic, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clue
|
| (...) I think that would be super-confusing, especially from browsing a list of groups. :) What's wrong with .build.minifigs or .fun.gaming or .fun.activities for the sort of thing linked to above? Or even .general ? --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
