Subject:
|
Re: Clue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 03:04:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
200 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Matthew Miller writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Inspired by Chris Maddison:
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=7381
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=7382
> >
> > Do we need a lugnet.on-topic.fun? This is certainly Lego related.
>
> I think that would be super-confusing, especially from browsing a list of
> groups. :)
>
> What's wrong with .build.minifigs or .fun.gaming or .fun.activities for the
> sort of thing linked to above? Or even .general ?
Nothing's *wrong* with either of the groups. But I would think it excessive
xposting, because I could be posting to tons of "suitable" groups. It seemed
to me most appropriate in .org.cw, where Scar is well known; and off-
topic.fun, because it's a fun thing. But I see Matthew's point, it's "off-
topic for .off-topic". Probably lugnet.fun would be a better place. Or
something.
-Shiri
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clue
|
| Shiri Dori wrote in message ... (...) seemed (...) It sounds like everyone has forgotten what .general is for... oh well, it does mean that I spend less time in front of the computer. *sigh* Paul LUGNET member 164 (URL) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clue
|
| (...) I think that would be super-confusing, especially from browsing a list of groups. :) What's wrong with .build.minifigs or .fun.gaming or .fun.activities for the sort of thing linked to above? Or even .general ? --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
