Subject:
|
Re: Clue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:30:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
280 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Matthew Miller writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Inspired by Chris Maddison:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=7381
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=7382
>
> Do we need a lugnet.on-topic.fun? This is certainly Lego related.
I think that would be super-confusing, especially from browsing a list of
groups. :)
What's wrong with .build.minifigs or .fun.gaming or .fun.activities for the
sort of thing linked to above? Or even .general ?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Another possibility would be to populate lugnet.fun with a newsgroup. The links above certainly could be posted to all of the groups Todd mentions, but I can see some advantage to having a lugnet.fun for stuff people aren't sure how to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Nothing, except that people -- even completely reasonable people *grin* -- seem drawn to post lego-related fun in .off-topic.fun. (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Clue
|
| (...) Nothing's *wrong* with either of the groups. But I would think it excessive xposting, because I could be posting to tons of "suitable" groups. It seemed to me most appropriate in .org.cw, where Scar is well known; and off- topic.fun, because (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
