Subject:
|
Re: Member Password Center
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 May 2000 21:35:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4740 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> > Todd Lehman wrote:
> > > In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > The fact that an issue results in high traffic means that it needs
> > > > fixed - not swept under the carpet. The merits of my suggestion aside,
> > > > some pretty weak logic is being applied here.
> > > It isn't up for discussion, and it never really was. Drop it.
> > Isn't this a discussion group?
>
> That it is!
>
>
> > How does this discussion go against the terms of use?
>
> Hummm, did I somehow imply that it did?
>
>
> > I don't think it was a good idea either, and nobody can make you implement
> > anything, but why can't he discuss it, that's what I don't understand.
>
> All right, fine. I forgot the "please."
>
> Scott, please drop this -- you're beating a very dead horse.
For the record, I raised this issue once. My other messages in the thread
related to the nature of the debate and not the issue itself – or at least
that was my intention.
Scott A
> In my best
> estimation, the password checker is appropriate (if not a shade lax) for the
> level of security needed going forward here over the coming months/years.
> Other sites are indeed more lax, for various reasons. I really do not
> believe there is anyone who will be unable to find and remember a good
> password, especially if they follow the advice here:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/?p=password-suggestions
>
> That is about all I have to say. I really would rather not spend my time
> arguing over trivialities like this. Please respect that. If you want to
> keep talking about it, fine, but don't expect me to take any of it seriously.
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) That it is! (...) Hummm, did I somehow imply that it did? (...) All right, fine. I forgot the "please." Scott, please drop this -- you're beating a very dead horse. In my best estimation, the password checker is appropriate (if not a shade (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
