Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet.robotics and the Robotics List
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:48:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1133 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote in message ...
> I think I suggested earlier -- if not, I meant to :) -- that the list could
> be gatewayed to a subgroup, like lugnet.robotics.mailing-list or
> lugnet.lists.lego-robotics. This makes the seperation more conscious.
> There's pros and cons to both ways.
This is a possibility that would provide at least one group with a
semi-guaranteed semblance of order, but it does not address the problem
still existing on the mail list, and thus the proposed
Lugnet.robotics.mail-list. I want access to the knowledge contained in the
mail list membership, and if it was a separate group I would still have to
read that group... noise and all (yes this is selfish). Lugneters do not
make the majority of posts to robotics, and a loss of the list membership
would be a loss indeed. Not to mention the dual threads on similar topics
in each of the two groups. I suggest that we explore fixing the problem
before dealing with it. I make it known that I am for the beneficial
integration of the mail list members into Lugnet, and my suggestions will be
mostly to this end.
Recently I posted a query (in *.robotics) asking who was still reading
through the mail list, and why they weren't taking advantage of the other
services offered by Lugnet. Not one reply, even though I now know that list
members make up the majority of traffic.
I think we have to see if the list owner is interested in making the move to
Lugnet. Ask him to pose the question to the membership. This is a similar
to recruiting form RTL... very sensitive. And I would like to hear if
others even think it is a good idea.
Something we have mentioned before, is the member webpage links to Lugnet.
Every member of Lugnet with a webpage should think to themselves "does
Lugnet do a service for me?"... if yes, put a Lugnet button link on your
page!!!
LINC
Ps the recent torrent of off-topic posts seems to have died, but I think we
should stay with hashing out the possibilities, because I think it will get
more frequent.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lugnet.robotics and the Robotics List
|
| Linc Smith wrote in message ... (...) list (...) I read via the mailing list instead of via lugnet for a couple of reasons: 1) My email comes in via IMAP, where my news doesn't. IMAP keeps my read/unread status on the server, which means that I can (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet.robotics and the Robotics List
|
| (...) I think I suggested earlier -- if not, I meant to :) -- that the list could be gatewayed to a subgroup, like lugnet.robotics.mailing-list or lugnet.lists.lego-robotics. This makes the seperation more conscious. There's pros and cons to both (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
