Subject:
|
Re: .market.auction & crossposting
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:54:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 04:24:42 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> No, not the way I construed it. Mere mention of existence is not
> solicitation. Solicitation requires an offer.
My opinion is with Todd on this one - it is a mild form of
silicitation, I think.
>
> http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=solicitation
> meaning #2 of verb transitive (NOT meaning #2 of verb INtransitive,
> thank you very much, this being a family forum and all)
Arguably, those people flog as well. Both themselves and others ;)
> > And if it's not, but then what does the subject line alone say?
> >
> > (a) Subject: [FA] - eBay - Lego CUSTOM: - Unique 4 axle custom Hopper
> >
> > (b) Subject: Discussion: Historic new auction lot
>
> Got me there, if I had the power to revise, I would. But I can't cancel
> and repost without breaking a pretty big post tree at this point.
And that's the crucial point between a solicitation and a mention.
I would also argue that a mention of the auction should have been done
without a URL.
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: .market.auction & crossposting
|
| To the viewing audience: I'm sparring with Todd here in this particular instance because it's fun to see two pedants clash, not because I have some major beef... He's mostly right but you'll never get me to admit it. (...) Arguably it's not the only (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|