 | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
|
| | | Disregard this - I'm an IDIOT!!! (...) is (...) the (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) TOLD you we didn't need to pick on your orientation. (myself, I prefer north facing, keeps the moss out of my eyes) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | (...) north side of the tree. Wouldn't the moss be in Larry's eyes. Larry moss be wrong again :') (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I have eyes in the back of my head. And they're bigger than my stomach. So no, you're barking up the wrong tree, leave it alone. (I pruned lugnet.off-topic.fun from the groups list) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) gonna leaf it alone, eh? It was a lawn time coming. (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Mown. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Does Larry have moss in his eyes? No? See, it works. Steve (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) He must be in the Southern hemisphere, at least at the time of writing. This is plausible...He appears to travel a great deal. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Chris Weeks (1) has once again explained things for the benefit of those unbelievers who didn't immediately leap to the correct conclusion... that I was speaking from an OZ perspective. Oh, you doubters, you try me so. Be of good cheer, (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) What? Have I been doing this too much of late? I just like to come up with the explanations. And isn't acolyte a piece of Catholic jargon anyway? In what way are you linked to His Holiness? (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) We're both Polish? But no, acolyte is generic. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hiya Ed, Was your experience a completely-brain-spaced-out kind of thing, or was there something on the page which was confusing? --Todd (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I was having a major blond moment (while in the midst of editing an Excel Macro manual), forgot to hit the Reply button. Funny how that works. (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) So it was a case of not being able to [subconsciously and immediately] determine whether the page was an existing-aritcle display or a new-article posting page? --Todd (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I think it was the effect of working with MS software. :) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | (...) Mike: you don't know how right you are!!! Todd: simply a case of "ya can't reply till ya click the reply icon" (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Hey, as a former blond (just take a look at my baby pictures), I find that remark defamatory. Just kidding. (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) As a current brunet (1), I find that remark very famitory. Cheers, - jsproat 1. Is this the masculine form of brunette? (2) 2. Did I just call myself a burrito? Is that a blond moment? :-P (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Interesting. Going through www.dictionary.com, to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, brunette comes from the French, as a dimunitive of brune. So I guess us brown-hair men are brunes, or maybe bruins. But the interesting part is the (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
|
| | | | (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Wrongo. Now, it's easy. Mr. Popiel sells spray on hair...you can have any kind you like. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
