Subject:
|
Re: "fired"?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:17:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
971 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ken Nagel wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:
> > I was directly involved in the Maersk debate with Mr. Nagel, including a post
> > where he accused his employer of lying to the public:
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/lego/?n=3015
>
>
> And the point is? I take back nothing that was said.
Ken,
I don't expect you to, and I do respect that you have your own personal opinions
about Lego even if I don't always agree with them.
But the point here is that other individuals have participated (speaking as
themselves) in Lugnet while also working for Lego Retail. I don't recall any of
them being fired for it - but nor do I recall them actively questioning their
employer in the manner that you have been doing lately.
Can you tell us if you were fired for merely posting on Lugnet, or were you
fired for the content of your posts? There is a difference.
Spencer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) All I know is what I ws told. I said I didn't mention anythiing that wasn't public knowledge and the reply was "That doesn't matter" Ken (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) And the point is? I take back nothing that was said. (...) I wasn't trying to keep it a secret however it wasn't up to a Lugnet administrator to violate the TOU and raise it up the flag pole. (...) Having you feel sorry for me is so far down (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
