 | | The whole story?
|
| (...) Assuming that's actually why he was terminated. Everyone is jumping to the conclusion that they have the whole story, all the facts. As we have seen so many times before, that may not be the case. There may be more to this than that. Who (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) You are pathetic. I guess your apology wasn’t worth the keystrokes it took to enter it. The manager had in his hands printouts of my posts. (...) I don't have to say it. It's there for everyone to refere back to. (...) That info came from (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| Snipped a lot of stuff to get to the crux. (...) So you're not denying that you did in fact pass around unannounced information? (regardless of source, it was unannounced, right?) (...) Irrelevant. Was it unannounced at the time? If so, are you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) wow, I guess I've been away for a while. I'm not even following this thread - I read only Lar's and this one. But it's enough for me to see that there's rudeness being flung toward those who deserve the community's respect. This is directed at (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) No I passed along public information as witnessed by the fact I found it throught normal public channels. (...) Don't know what they wanted announced but the fact is the horse was out of the barn. (...) My assessment is the fact that you are (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) This is what I thought at the onset of the problem. I thought just because his name was every where in the community he was to be respected. From talking to others I've found out I was wrong. Respect is earned not granted because one is there. (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) Do we even know that the library took offense? I've read nothing here at LUGNET from the Library that found Larry's post offensive. Furthermore, reading Larry's post from any outsider point of view, how could one take serious offense to (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Ken Nagel wrote: <snip> (...) Selective interpretation--I posted that I wasn't in favour of his petition and left it there, as did others. The debate started when people rightlypointed out the fallacies (misrepresenting in (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: Snipped unnecessary post (...) If your looking for a fight head back to one of the debate forums. Ken (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: Snipped unnecessary post (...) If your looking for a fight head back to one of the debate forums. Ken (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) I recieved it. I wish I had replied with a message that said "Thank you for bringing this to my attention." But I wouldn't have recommended Lar for a timeout (he was obviously trying to joke), and I'm not entirely sure my email would have (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
