 | | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Excellent idea. Yes, more international involvement before too long. (...) Kelly (he -- Irish name) is of Portland, Oregon. (...) Indeed! (...) I agree gtg --Todd (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | More old LUGNET homepage prototypes discovered
|
|
Whoa, I'd totally forgotten about these... These are a few prototypes from the last LUGNET homepage makeover process, which was May to August of 2000. As you can see it was somewhat iterative. I'm throwing these out here as food for thought. For (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: T-Shirts
|
|
(...) I too hope I am not stepping on anyones toes but... I have a brother who does silk screened tshirt (www.gridlock.com). I could twist his arm and get him to do the shirts at very little (or no expected) cost to lugnet. I hope I can help. I (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | w00t! Fund Drive for LUGNET Servers
|
|
We appreciated your patience during the downtime today Thank you for bearing an unusually long downtime today. We certainly weren't expecting a 9-hour outage simply for the replacement of a disk. You may have noticed on the LUGNET homepage during (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.castle, lugnet.space, lugnet.org, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | We are back up
|
|
(...) Well, we are back up. As I'm sure you noticed, downtime was greather than 10 minutes. What took so long was double-checking the integrity of everything carefully after the swap (and making an additional full backup before making any changes to (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
(...) ..... and PaB. Nice long list from Palisades to come as soon as I'm sure we're in the clear. Dawn (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
And there was Post. And the Admin saw it, and said, "This is pleasing to us." And the Host of Users rejoiced. Yea, verily. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let There Be Post
|
|
... and Schleim too. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Let There Be Post
|
|
Looks like it is happy. (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Hear hear! I'll speak the same for myself (and as much as I have the power to do so, the same for the LEGO MindStorms Forums). LEGO is such a community-focused product that I think it's the least I can do to offer my help if it's wanted. Just (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Very nice! My only complaint is that all the black is gone, leaving the page with too much white space. But everything else is great. Marc Nelson Jr. (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Well I know that there are some goof balls who take the time to use MichLUG.org's contact form to spam us MichLUGers. So if someone is willing to waste their time on that I can only assume the same would be true of a much larger site like (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Good Man! This is great news Todd. (...) Great team! May I suggest you should consider asking one or two international representatives as well (unless Kelly is, because she (he?) apparently isn't a Lugnet member and I have never met them)? I'm (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Orion, do you have any basis for making a blanket statement such as your first sentence? I'm not trying to defend or condemn anybody, but that's bad logic to just say "trust me.." and not give any reason. Your next sentence provides a reason, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about this for a while myself. It's a great way to stimulate both creativity and lateral thinking! May I suggest "Tricky Bricks Incorporated" and propose the small rubber band holder as the first contender: (URL) should be (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
Todd, et al: Here is a quick and dirty idea for a new home page. I cobbled it together in photoshop. It is relativly unpopulated and it not very space-optimized. But I hope you get the idea: (URL) idea is the left column is Lugnet-specific stuff, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I'd rather see the link directory be well architected than reflect majority opinion. This would require a few thoughtful, knowledgeable, and fair people to give a little bit of time to maintaining it. This isn't voting on major policy here, we (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) In the clear cases, there is no argue that they could get as good results as few admins. In the 'grey' cases, the voting of more people can make the result to represent the majority opinion, which may not be the case of few admins. (...) It (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with LUGNET web site statistics
|
|
Thanks for posting these. Although I have absolutely no use for them I find statistics facinating. I had a brief look at the Korean pages you mentioned, all seem very professional but of course completely unintelligable (even with the Korean fonts (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Our company decided that all of the webhosters are too restrictive, so we went the serverhosting way, where man can have lots of freedom without any additional payments. RH Enterprise + 700gbs of traffic monthly for relatively low price. I can (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
