 | | HELLO! BRICKSHELF ADMIN? ANYONE??
|
|
A month ago I uploaded scans for set 276. I've emailed K.Loch, I've posted here before, nothing seems to happen. Since the folder is still not public the moderators have obviously noticed what's in there. NOW WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET THE SCANS IN (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: link labels
|
|
(...) Like Microsoft Outlook XP? (...) On the other hand, the webmail application my school uses (iPlanet Messenger Express) correctly identifies a space as an end of URL, but does *not* recognize a > as an end of URL. --Bram (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Message date anomoly?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> skrev i meddelandet news:HGLK4o.JG9@lugnet.com... (...) using (...) confirmation. (...) the (...) Yeah, this happens to me all the time. Mostly my posts are sent the day _after_ I write them (If I don't remember to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Threads on Lugnet
|
|
(...) Here's another suggestion: How 'bout a way for a poster to tag a post as having a picture or link to picture or MOC? So one could easily browse the announcements of new MOCs before wading through the commentary about them. James Wilson Dallas, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: link labels
|
|
(...) I understand the convention better now. Sorry, I haven't read any of the FTX docs, since I'm not a big fan of web-based stuff when other formats place less load on the server and networks, and are easier for me to use. I'm not a URL and HTTP (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: link labels - my poorly written Netscape6 newsreader....
|
|
Actually, clicking the links doesn't work within my Netscape mail. Any 'Preference-TAB' I have to modify perhaps?? Please help, I'm getting a little bit sick of all these non-working Links in the postings 'new style'. Kind regards, Klaas H. Meijaard (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Message date anomoly?
|
|
(...) Hmmm, I don't recall ever seeing this happen before either, but I'll bet it happens a lot (or at least more often than we notice). Here's what the logs say happened: John posted the message on June 7 using the web interface. He wasn't signed (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Formatting of post summary
|
|
(...) Ross, Thank you for reporting these two bugs!!! --Todd (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | link labels
|
|
(...) Nope, you didn't do anything bad -- your links were beautiful. :-) (...) It's conceivable that there might be a really poorly written miscreant newsreader/e-mail client in existence out there somewhere that get confused and think that the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | link labels
|
|
(...) Chris, :) Not to be picky, but actually, all of the URLs that Steve gave are perfectly valid and legal URLs. (...) His URLs don't contain spaces. The spaces you see are legal terminators of the URL, and the stuff after the space could be (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Formatting of post summary
|
|
(...) Looks like its fine in the post 8?) but not in the preview 8?( ROSCO (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Formatting of post summary
|
|
Hi, Just noticed a little anomoly when formatting posts for the brief summary, it seems to be something to do with URLs. See the following post: <</loc/au/vic/mel/?n=208>> The summary has no "Thanks" after the URL, but the actual post does. Also, I (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Message date anomoly?
|
|
Todd, Not sure why, but in the web view message (URL) dated June 7th appears in the middle of a bunch of other messages dated June 11th, as seen on this page (URL) Perhaps it's something explainable, but I thought I'd point it out since I don't (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "The Matrix:Reloaded " & "X2 :X-Men United" available in DVD now
|
|
(...) It looks normal, regardless of whether I use carriage returns to seperate the lines, or if I let the lines wrap to the ">" marks. (...) It would be a lot easier to tell if it's fixed if I had tried to do this before you tweaked it so I could (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ">" line wrapping subtleties
|
|
(...) Normally, no, but in this case I was going through and doing heavy tweakage to the original text to make it a bit more interesting to read. (...) Er, sorta. I actually did most of the reformat myself, by deleting ">" marks in the middle of (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "The Matrix:Reloaded " & "X2 :X-Men United" available in DVD now
|
|
(...) Correctly meaning wrapped (which is technically the incorrect way to display super long lines), or correctly meaning with no line breaks (e.g., true to the literal representation of the line)? (...) I don't think I've seen this. Can you point (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sig help?
|
|
Excellent! Makes perfect sense and thanks very much for your kind help Andy....looks just right now. Cheers & thanks, -Gil (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sig help?
|
|
Hi Gil, I'm not an administrator, but I had a similar problem when I was creating a page for myself on Lugnet. You can read about it in this thread: (URL) net result is that Lugnet has an Image Size Cache, so that it can efficiently display images (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sig help?
|
|
Hello all, Any ideas? I have a feeling it's a problem on my end. Cheers & Thanks, -Gil (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "The Matrix:Reloaded " & "X2 :X-Men United" available in DVD now
|
|
(...) Hi Todd, I've seen this behavior in a few other people's posts. One other thing that I notice is that if you view the entire thread nested on one page, the offending post appears correctly. But if you view the entire thread linearly on one (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
