| |
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis
> thingie which I snipped:
>
> My question here is "What are you using this information for which requires
> such analysis?".
>
> I mean do you base your set purchases on these figures? And if so, how many
> times have you been burned by false "0" or "100" votes??
>
> Come on people! Just get back to building!
I'm not sure information impracticality is really an excuse for inaccurate
or misleading information. I think the point is that if we *can* get more
accurate information, why not do it? Clearly this topic interests some
people who actively want better analysis (or who are intregued by the
analystics challenge), and doesn't interest others. In light of that, maybe
this thread should just go to lugnet.admin.general.
DaveE
FUT admin.general
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis thingie which I snipped: My question here is "What are you using this information for which requires such analysis?". I mean do you base your set purchases on these figures? (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
