Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:24:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
568 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ken Godawa writes:
> I'm curious on why so many of the popular sets receive a "zero" rating.
Can you give an example of one othe "popular sets" to which you refer? I'm
just curious to know which ones we're discussing.
> It just doesn't make any sense. Unless it's a valid reason, these ratings
> should be thrown out. Either these people are jealous or
> complete morons.
Perhaps it is a valid reason. I don't think very many folks around here are
morons. No moron could survive the LUGNET signup process. ;)
As well... what would your solution to this problem be? Would you like to
see the zero rating removed? Should every set, no matter how good or bad,
get a minimum 10 rating? Or, like in some judged sports, should we remove
the highest and the lowest rating in order to better average out the
remaining votes?
Regards,
Allan B.
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| one example: Lego Star Destroyer 10030: (URL) zero was there before they even began to be shipped, and they still haven't shipped to the states.. soooo... (...) perhaps not a moron.. perhaps a vindictive meanie. perhaps give all sets a rank based (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| "Allan Bedford" <ExpertBuilder-DELET...otome.com> wrote in message news:H5qDpB.K2@lugnet.com... (...) I'm (...) Here are a few sets that I can not understand what valid reason(s) for a "0" rating: 6399 Airport Shuttle - two "0" ratings 5571 Giant (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| (...) I would say probably not... some sets really ARE duds. (...) That's not a bad idea. It works for Figure Skating (and we know how fair and impartial THAT sport is!) Grin.... No seriously, it IS a good idea. I would say this, though.... how abou (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| Is there any way to make the rating public? The votes must be linked to the voter somehow in the database. Could links be set up on the 100-0 scale to let people see who voted 100, 90, ..., 0 for the set. Maybe people would vote how they actually (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| I'm curious on why so many of the popular sets receive a "zero" rating. It just doesn't make any sense. Unless it's a valid reason, these ratings should be thrown out. Either these people are jealous or complete morons. (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
