Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:26:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
631 times
|
| |
|
|
> > Before anyone says this is ridiculous, I would point out that here in
> > Queensland, we operate our tertiary admissions system on this basis.
> We do this for meat grading in Australia -
> we have a system were meat graders are regularly correlated with a common
> eye group to ensure that all graders are calling the same results for the
> same appearance of carcases.
Hmm, I see a lot of potential for expanding your organisation's efforts from
carcases to live animals, to be specific, tertiary applicants. Given the way
the parents moan about all the statistical moderation that takes place, I think
a lot of them would be far happier if we just brought meat graders into the
schools and applied objective criteria (height, weight, colour consistency,
building time -- parents to advise, being Timmies or Jar Jars, etc).
Kerry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| (...) I'm not sure that an average rating of 50 would be appropriate in this context. One of the ongoing themes of discussion in LUGNET is that LEGO set designs deteriorate over time. The apex of LEGO set design is generally thought to be in the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
