Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:17:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
704 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Johannes Koehler writes:
> Hello!
>
> In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis
> > thingie which I snipped
>
> Well done :-)
Same for your comment, Jojo!
I could not agree more (pling!).
I think it is worth to spend a thought why people do rate some sets with
extreme votes, but I think, once we have realized they do so, we can easily
count it in. Any manipulation of the votes filters information out. I want to
know that some people have extreme feelings about sets.
If I look for e.g. at the rating of 375 (I own it and have rated it therefor
with 80% // it's too yellow to be more than 80), then I take a look at the
whole disdtribution of votings and not at the excact number of average rating.
I do not care if it is 91.3 or 87.6. But I see lots ob big red bars in the
top. So people obviously do love the set.....
Back to building!
Ben
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| Hello! (...) Well done :-) I couldn't follow these analyses anyhow. First I was always bad at maths and secondly I didn't understand half of the sentences without looking up every other word.... (...) Absolutely correct! I think this set rating is (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
