Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 04:43:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
703 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis
> thingie which I snipped:
>
> My question here is "What are you using this information for which requires
> such analysis?".
>
> I mean do you base your set purchases on these figures? And if so, how many
> times have you been burned by false "0" or "100" votes??
I think if you criticise this, you fail to, fundamentally, get the point
behind being obsessed with LEGO(r). Further, this mechanism really lets the
obsessive/compulsive among us obsess about yet another thing, and by arguing
against it you're taking all the fun out of it.
> Come on people! Just get back to building!
I did. And boy are my thumbs sore (had to say it!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| (...) On the contrary! I encourage those who are so inclined to study these figures and do what they want with them! I just dont think it's necessary for such analysis to be "built in" to Lugnet. Unless, of course, Todd finds it interesting and (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis thingie which I snipped: My question here is "What are you using this information for which requires such analysis?". I mean do you base your set purchases on these figures? (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
