Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:47:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1069 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Kerry Raymond writes a really neat statistical analysis
> > thingie which I snipped:
> >
> > My question here is "What are you using this information for which requires
> > such analysis?".
> >
> > I mean do you base your set purchases on these figures? And if so, how many
> > times have you been burned by false "0" or "100" votes??
>
> I think if you criticise this, you fail to, fundamentally, get the point
> behind being obsessed with LEGO(r). Further, this mechanism really lets the
> obsessive/compulsive among us obsess about yet another thing, and by arguing
> against it you're taking all the fun out of it.
On the contrary! I encourage those who are so inclined to study these
figures and do what they want with them! I just dont think it's necessary
for such analysis to be "built in" to Lugnet. Unless, of course, Todd finds
it interesting and *wants* to implement it 8?)
> > Come on people! Just get back to building!
>
> I did. And boy are my thumbs sore (had to say it!)
Just use your other fingers a bit! I'm mean I've heard the expression "all
thumbs" but I think you've taken it a bit far 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| (...) I think if you criticise this, you fail to, fundamentally, get the point behind being obsessed with LEGO(r). Further, this mechanism really lets the obsessive/compulsive among us obsess about yet another thing, and by arguing against it you're (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
