Subject:
|
Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:02:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
231 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> > x I understand the question but dislike the way it is phrased
> > x The question seems biased toward a particular outcome
> > x The choices seem biased toward a particular outcome
> > x (other)
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> One worry is that too many choices are presented here.
> I wonder if the last three before "other" could be a single choice.
I think the top two of the last three definitely could.
Regarding the very last non-other choice, aren't there cases, though, where
the question is phrased perfectly but the choices are biased? Or in those
cases, is it always also the case that a needed choice is absent?
> > And it would only display these as applicable.
>
> Are any choices other than the 1st only applicable to particular
> mechanical types of polls?
oh, no, sorry, I just meant that it didn't have to display all the answers
to the meta-poll -- only the ones that had nonzero tallies.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
