To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 10549
10548  |  10550
Subject: 
Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:14:16 GMT
Viewed: 
209 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:

In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
I like your suggested mandatory/automatic addons.

Me too.  I think it's a great idea.  Meta-polling seems like useful feedback
for the poll conductor and for the community in general.  I'd like it to be
multiple-select, though, since it's possible that one or reasons more apply.

Definitely multiple answers may apply, I guess I wasn't clear enough on
that point.

How does the following sound?  Do the choices cover all the bases?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am choosing not to answer this poll because:

x One selection isn't enough; I need to be able to select two or more
x A crucial selection I want to make is not present
x This poll is too much effort for me; if it were simpler, I would do it
x I don't think I'm part of the target audience of this poll
x Others may enjoy it, but I prefer more serious polls
x I don't understand the question
x I understand the question but dislike the way it is phrased
x The question seems biased toward a particular outcome
x The choices seem biased toward a particular outcome
x (other)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One worry is that too many choices are presented here.

I wonder if the last three before "other" could be a single choice.

And it would only display these as applicable.

Are any choices other than the 1st only applicable to particular
mechanical types of polls?

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
 
(...) I think the top two of the last three definitely could. Regarding the very last non-other choice, aren't there cases, though, where the question is phrased perfectly but the choices are biased? Or in those cases, is it always also the case (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
 
(...) Me too. I think it's a great idea. Meta-polling seems like useful feedback for the poll conductor and for the community in general. I'd like it to be multiple-select, though, since it's possible that one or reasons more apply. How does the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

11 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR