To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 10557
10556  |  10558
Subject: 
Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 03:51:50 GMT
Viewed: 
215 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:

oh, no, sorry, I just meant that it didn't have to display all the answers
to the meta-poll -- only the ones that had nonzero tallies.

I am trying to catch up, I was at a client all day today in SF (hearing the
F line PCCs rattling by 8 stories below was particularly frustrating) that
blocks LUGNET(TM) access as being "chat room" type.... so forgive me if this
has already been said:

I'm really digging this potential enhancement.

But I think a bigger enhancement needed is the abilities: to close a poll
(no more votes after a certain day) to delete a poll completely, and to edit
a poll and its questions (dumping all of the votes so far) and try again.

? what do you think ?

Also I just caught that "active threads in lugnet.blog" thing. Way way cool!
You go Todd!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
 
(...) I think the top two of the last three definitely could. Regarding the very last non-other choice, aren't there cases, though, where the question is phrased perfectly but the choices are biased? Or in those cases, is it always also the case (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

11 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR