Subject:
|
Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:47:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
176 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I like your suggested mandatory/automatic addons.
Me too. I think it's a great idea. Meta-polling seems like useful feedback
for the poll conductor and for the community in general. I'd like it to be
multiple-select, though, since it's possible that one or reasons more apply.
How does the following sound? Do the choices cover all the bases?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am choosing not to answer this poll because:
x One selection isn't enough; I need to be able to select two or more
x A crucial selection I want to make is not present
x This poll is too much effort for me; if it were simpler, I would do it
x I don't think I'm part of the target audience of this poll
x Others may enjoy it, but I prefer more serious polls
x I don't understand the question
x I understand the question but dislike the way it is phrased
x The question seems biased toward a particular outcome
x The choices seem biased toward a particular outcome
x (other)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it would only display these as applicable.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Polls as propaganda devices.
|
| (...) Good point. The poll, however, doesn't say that LEGO has to do anything per se, just that there is or isn't a problem with the track geometry. I like your suggested mandatory/automatic addons. (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
