To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 10465 (-20)
  patience please
 
Hi all, I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by the amount of stuff I really want to reply to here.. - Right now I'm writing a summary of my opinions on the posting privileges issue, because I see people making false assumptions. I'd also like to set up a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Biggest Thread on Lugnet?
 
Hi all! I have a question. Does anyone know how to access the biggest threads in post count on lugnet? I have noticed through my time on Lugnet that some really large threads developed in a matter of days on some very interesting and thought (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GxrFKF.D3p@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) a (...) Just don't forget Suz your only human. (mini-fig) -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) yup. I screwed up. -Suz (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) Actually Bill Ward is right... as an admin, Suz needs to lead by example. What she posted earlier today was in my opinion very shocking and inappropriate. I have to also look at her flaming policy as of late and "judge her by her own words"... (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) banned (...) No, I attacked her conduct. As the LUGNET Admin, she should be following a higher standard. Stooping to this level was completely out of line, and deserved a strong response. Please keep this in lugnet.admin.general, where I set (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
And then you turn around and attack Suz personally, I think you should be banned also. All you really needed was your first paragraph.. Tamy (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) Her post sure seems to be in violation of the rules: (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
Todd, Dan, etc.: This user, "LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> is engaging in personal attacks. Please disable her access until she is ready to apologize for this wholly inappropriate response. XFUT: lugnet.admin.general (Suz: You have lost the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general) !! 
 
  Re: a few new things
 
(...) As many as will fit? What form did you want answers to this to take? (...) The mockups and the current page both have fine small print, but I wouldn't go much smaller. (...) In the blue Newsgroups sidebar. Move the 'newsgroups' header to the (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: a few new things
 
The redesign looks good. For logged in users, how about links to that user's My Collection and Lugnet Homepage? I like to use (URL) as my "portal page" to the rest of Lugnet, but right now the quickest way from there to my My Collection page, which (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Posting to the future......
 
(...) Oh ok I see, I thought that it would be going of an East coast time zone. So that was my reasion for concern. By the way I live on the West coast. Dave (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Posting to the future......
 
(...) What time zone are you in? LUGNET server uses GMT for internal times. If you're in Pacific or Mountain that seems about right to me. (I forget if eastern is 6 or 5 off GMT at this very instant and am too lazy to look it up even though it's (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Posting to the future......
 
I just posted to LUGNET.Trains and noticed it said that I posted it on Saturday June 8th at about 4:30am. And its still only Friday the 7th about 9:30pm. So I just thought I would brind this up so someone else nows about it. Dave PS I hope this is (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: a few new things
 
(...) While I agree with the above, PLEASE enable a return after typing to start a search - I HATE sites that have a text entry box and hitting return at that point will do nothing. On a sidenote - I use the (URL) Search, have it set to the Search (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: a few new things
 
<snipped> This is truely an interesting subject. Can a fan related site become too professional? I feel not, because the things that make commercial sites look so much like commercial sites are the adds, the cluttered look and the flashy elements. (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Screwy email for Server
 
(...) OH, yeah, here is my authentication: Jude, Here is a copy of the message you posted to lugnet.robotics... --LUGNET Server ___...___ |Newsgroups: lugnet.robotics |References: <Gx6x4M.K99@lugnet.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020604....frii.com> (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Screwy email for Server
 
(...) That is what I don't get. I only post via the web. I do not like having to authenticate. <g> Could it be a result of the robotics mailing list? Why would a bounce have the same date/time stamp as my posted message? Jude (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Screwy email for Server
 
(...) that can't be right? if you look at the message the server bounced at you, it has an html copy of the message, etc - seems like it was an email sent to the mailing list? or am I misunderstanding here? Dan (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: a few new things
 
(...) I think it was a fine design. I was simply offering an opinion from a different point of view. I took from her original post that she was showing the mock-up in case anyone wanted to offer an opinion. I'm not sure she was actively soliciting (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR