 | | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) Okay, thanks. Keep us informed of any "Advanced Search" updates! TJ (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) I haven't really looked into it yet, but from what I know, the index that is used just indexes the article data, and the author's name/email. The '(details)' you see will not show up anyway, since it's not part of the article at all - it's (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) Well, can the spotlight page ((URL) be modified so that you can look back more than 14 days? Or could it be modified so that you could search a particular time span (e.g. March 1, 2000 to May 1, 2000)? I did try searching in NEWS for (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
(...) AFAIK, it cannot be done yet. Another thing to add to the 'Advanced Search' feature. One day, we'll have such a thing :) Dan (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Searching for Highlighted/Spotlighted Posts
|
|
How would I go about searching for old messages in a specific group that have been highlighted or spotlighted by members? For example, I want to find all the h/s'd posts in .technic in the past 2 years. How can this be done? thanks, TJ (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) in that case, you might want to sign up to one of the spam filtering services? I know some people have used them with much success, such as spamcop.net. (...) you can have as many setups as you need - but to use the spamblock, you only need (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> (...) is (...) change (...) post, (...) Oh, I see. I have actually changed my posting setup to include the block, but cannot send e-mail out using the block, as my mail server will not (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) that is correct - since you didn't change your "from" field to use the spamblock. What you need to do is create a new "posting setup" here: (URL) put in your spamblock email address in the "From" area. Then, change your mail client to send (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> (...) to (...) Dan, Question regarding this. I mostly post to LUGNET via e-mail. I just tried doing so using a spamblock in my reply-to header. This works fine, but my From: field still (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) are there some measure in place? yes, some. Is it possible to block out crawlers? not really. As long as anyone can point their browser (or newsreader) and connect to LUGNET, without requiring a password, the data there can be harvested. We (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
I've been getting a lot of these - but only to a defunct address that never posted on LUGNET before... (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) There is no formal proceedure, Shiri. -Suz (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) So, just to clarify - if I were to suggest my curatorship, I would do so first *within* lugnet.castle.org.cw? (as an example...) And then *if* I were approved by the posters in the group, I would email you? Or maybe I'm getting this all wrong. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GqtyyH.6A3@lugnet.com... (...) Nope, both debtreduction and asian-language are dropping in on my mail, in the order of 2-4 each day. This started suddenly (after Christmas?), and (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with change of email address and server authentication
|
|
Just replying to my own post. "Paul Baulch" <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Gqq88G.Aps@lugnet.com... (...) It's all sorted out now - the confirmation email arrived after ten or eleven days. Not a complaint - more of an FYI to anyone (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:Gqtw8r.KzB@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) I used to get their spam, and I forget if I added a filter against them or if I finally bugged them enough to remove me. Its pretty sad when a (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message ... (...) I've been getting lots and lots of debt0reduction spams but not much in the way of cell-phones. Also lots of asian-language spam, but I blame that on our (VLC's) and my appeareance in a chinese-language (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
(...) Are you still getting the Edventures mail? Because they seem to have gone more places than just LUGNET, I was getting their spam at all of the BricksWest addresses (which I don't use to post anywhere, though they may be mentioned in the body (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Possible crawler-bot alert?
|
|
Hi, I just wanted to ask if there's any evidence we've been visited by a spambot lately--suddenly there's been an enormous spike in spam (two or three a day, up from one every six months) to my .msu.edu account, which I *only* use to post here and (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RFC2047 encoded headers
|
|
RFC2047 is the standard way to encode non 7-bit characters in header fields since 1996. Headers which are not decoded look ugly, to say the least. Here are some examples: (URL) (Subject line) (URL) (From line) (URL) (From line) (URL) (Subject line) (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
