 | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I understand that each subcommunity is different. I'm not for strict adherence to the exact same set-in-stone standards for every obscure group on LUGNET. At the same time, each group should be mature and good-natured enough to practice (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Well, even though I volunteered publicly, and even though I think you'd make a fine curator for either or both group hierarchies, I'm thinking now, on second thought that it may be more appropriate to send notes to the Admins (for volunteering (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | .market Curators
|
|
(...) to (...) I would be willing to be curator for a few .market groups. When I read Lugnet daily, the first places I always look are the .market groups. I am very comfortable there and I think I have a very good perspective of what is needed and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I can't think of a single currently active participant who remotely seems to go out of his or her way to police newsgroups. And the only person I can think of at all who may have had the appearance of policing was just trying to be helpful. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Me either. As I said in my first email to David (perhaps using a not very good analogy didn't make that point very clear, admittedly). (...) Me too, me either. (...) I did but it didn't address that point. I may have been unclear but as I said (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:GqIEps.3H6@lugnet.com... (...) over. If that's what you think of the people (including myself) who are doing the policing, you don't know us well enough. I certainly don't scour LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) of (...) all (...) Disclaimer: I am not in any way an admin, just a concerned community member. Anyone who posts on LUGNET agreed to the TOS when they signed up. From the TOS ((URL) not) Post or transmit any (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
Hmm, I was trying to get myself out of this discussion... I for the most part would like to see the same picture David espouses. The problem that I see is that when people make these little "nudges", the "offender" takes offense and yells "why are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <Snip> (...) Wow, that cleaned up pretty good! Let's cut to the end of the tape... Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) is not a good thing. I'll tell you why: First thing-no names please--whatever (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) "test with name" fails on both IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 2000 and on IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 98. It appears the format failure is the "Joe Blow" part of the link. HTH James (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
