 | | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) Like James said my post was meant as Fun Mocking not nasty mocking. It wasn't meant as bashing at all. Fox is what it is and I was making Fun of it. If you took it another way then I am sorry but I won't apologize for directing it where I did (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) This message has been nothing more than the Fox News Channel bashing, that is why, hence debate. (...) Because I do not like seeing debate material outside where it belongs, among others. Scott S. -- ***...*** Please visit (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: GA State Flag
|
|
(...) You can find one to scale down at (URL) _think_ that it's being slowly phased in and isn't going to be "the official flag" for a few more weeks while they all get sewn together... -JDF (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For posting in BST? That's not quite how I remember it...I thought it was for excessive multiposting -- across multiple themed groups. I guess there was a discussion about BST once... (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | next/prev links in web interface
|
|
Todd, Please consider putting the next/prev (1606 1608 for example) links at BOTH the top and the bottom of a displayed post in the web interface. I find that I often scroll down to read a multi screen post, then need to scroll back up to hit the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | GA State Flag
|
|
Todd, Minor issue here. GA's state flag changed earlier this month. I don't know where you got your flag graphics from, but GA's in now different. Mike ----- Mike Faunce mike at faunce dot com (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) I agree. James said "upper end of cottage" as a fuzzy line. I am nowhere near that boundary. Todd (sort of) said "automation with no human contact" as the demarcation for shopping. Judgement is required here, since when you call one of the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) If it's a straight sale, then .market.buy-sell-trade; if it's an auction (i.e., soliciting progressively higher bids from earlier bids), then market.auction, if you're a retailer (e.g., BusyBee, TRU, Target, S@H, etc.) or you're posting (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) initial (...) incorporated. (...) I don't know, but DYA got reprimanded for posting to BST. I thought that "real" stores weren't suppose to post in BST. Maybe Todd needs to update the BST descriptions. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Hmm, good question. I'm not Todd, but I'd be inclined to set the (fuzzy) line at the (indistinct) top edge of cottage industry. How's that for precision? (...) It's a difference of degree, technically, but I'd call it kind, at least for Lugnet (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
