 | | Re: LUGNet shut off
|
|
(...) I, for one, endorse immediate, full-blown hysteria. All this reasonable analysis misses a golden opportunity for us to run around like headless chickens. (...) IMO you’d be within your rights, even if it would ruffle some feathers, to say (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNet shut off
|
|
(...) I am still struggling with the timing. I'm relieved that there has been no rush of panic! Here's what I'm thinking at the moment... For my own sanity, it seems reasonable that a rough course of action be decided upon by Aug 1. That is to say, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) Hi, Ray! Short answer (quoting a friend): a) Lugnet needs a sustainable governing mechanism. b) Lugnet needs a sustainable revenue source. c) etc... There are all kinds of possibile aproaches to those first two blocks, but 'A' might mean (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) I'm not an insider at LUGNET and I've never seen the code or heard about until the remarks here. I have been a coder/designer (and whatever terms apply) at various shops over the years and I *have* seen code where calling it 'patched' would (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
(...) Some parts are excessively documented (like the PML engine) and some parts are poorly documented (like the query engine), and the rest falls somewhere in the middle, mostly being scantily documented. (...) PML is just Perl inside of HTML...so (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jan-Albert van Ree wrote: [...] (...) Welllll.... I'm sorry to say that this didn't finish setup. The servers are there, but a few weeks ago they were to receive an upgrade to the new BU Linux, and I told MattM to hold off (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
Suz wrote: <SNIP big tech history> (...) Exactly, there are enough sites like that out there, to me it's the NNTP that made it unique. As for Dan's reply, I think he's spot on in several things. However it seems certain pieces of what he lists are (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
(...) The code does take some getting used to. Reading Todd's code was sometimes really amazing - you'd see he was planning for things you know he had no idea he will need one day. And whenever solving a new problem, there were always many hooks to (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
(...) yes. this touches on what I meant. And let me say, NNTP and the e-mail lists are extremely important to me. Todd was teaching himself Perl as he created LUGNET. This is what I'd call "personal project driven learning." Anyone who's done this (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) (I'm sorry... I oft forget that everyone doesn't know all that I do.) Yes, he did so when I went to Boston the first time. That was my reason for meeting with him face-to-face. Please consider me his buffer. [thinking...] ...I don't know how (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
