 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) There's no faulting flowing from this direction, merely a statement that there's a problem at the user's end. (...) Sorry, why not? I'm not clear on that really. If a user has a malformed or malfunctioning mail, why isn't that the user's issue (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Is that really a problem? I agree at some point *you* may wish to stop arguing, but why ask everyone else to? I think the problem with saying "The decision stands, we don't see the point of people discussing further" (or in fact ANY way of (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Well, as long as it was Scott, it was easy enough to disregard. It was just Scott, after all, noted button pusher. But when we get this mistrust from people we used to respect before they wigged out, or people we still do want to respect for (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I don't know? Be aware that your emails might not be getting where you send them, and not fault the user for it? It's STILL not the users' issue to solve. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Yeah, I don't believe this. The LPRV is a great example. The Admins gathered a group of people and said, we trust you guys! We want to know what you think! And then, seemingly out of nowhere, they started accusing the Admins of creating a (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Wow. You're right Ross, that is worded much better. That reminds me, I probably shouldn't be posting this right now without my lawyer being present. There might be some minor misunderstanding that prompts endless accusations at my character (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) What, you haven't been reading all two hundred posts over the past few days and the four hundred emails discussing how best to respond. (...) Well thanks Chris. Maybe you could tell us what that 'something' is that you're waiting for? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) OK. But it isn't set up NOW, is it? If so, what then? (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I'd recommend setting it up so it'll work then. I can think of a few ways to do this. However, it doesn't change the point that it's up to LUGNET to make sure the admins can send email to users, assuming the user has actually provided a valid (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Rosa Parks did what she did because the establishment was not interested in hearing her voice. Lugnet Admins, on the other hand, have always be interested in hearing the voices of all members and users of Lugnet. I don't see the need for civil (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
