Subject:
|
Re: Unique keys for sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:01:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, evard@mcs.anl.gov (Remy Evard) writes:
> [...]
> On the other hand, if it's the not-meant-for-humans style key, then
> I'd agree with Larry and slip it outside to column 9.
> [...]
OK, it's in column 9 now (the rightmost). Enjoy.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Unique keys for sets
|
| lpieniazek@novera.com (Larry Pieniazek) wrote in <386943AA.328BCF33@v...ager.net>: (...) If the key you're talking about is in the form of "8880-1", then I think column 1 makes sense. I would actually be quite happy with that as a solution for a (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
