To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.databaseOpen lugnet.admin.database in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Database / 516
515  |  517
Subject: 
Re: Unique keys for sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.database
Date: 
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 20:24:48 GMT
Viewed: 
344 times
  
Todd,

I guess what several of us want is for those keys (regardless of whether
they should be seen by humans or not) to appear in the Pause listings.  Many
(?) of us use the Pause listings to generate tables in our own databases and
then use that for other purposes (budgeting, # of pieces owned, etc.).  What
we'd like is to be able to grab the Pause listings with unique keys and use
it as the "corner stone" table for our own databases.

I know that eventually what we are doing is a goal for LUGNET, but some of
us are re-inventing the wheel periodically (monthly/quarterly/?) in order to
get the updated Pause data inserted into our applications.

Mike

--
Mike Faunce
mike at faunce dot com
LUGNET #96

"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:FnGL62.ApD@lugnet.com...
There's really no good "solution" in which the primary keys involve set
numbers.  Here's where I'm heading, BTW, WRT primary keys for the sets DB:

   http://www.lugnet.com/db/brictionary/?n=39

Of course, those are purely internal unique keys, not intended to be seen
by humans.  The nice thing is, 99% of sets are identifiable by a single
secondary key (the set number), and of the remaining 1%, more than half of
those are identifiable by an additional tertiary key (the year), and the
remainder are (hopefully) identifiable by an additional quaternary key • (the
theme).  So in practice, 99% of the links will still require only a single
set number, although additional parameters could always optionally be • used.

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Unique keys for sets
 
(...) Ok, I can stuff those in one of the columns. Are they most helpful in column 1, 2, or 9? --Todd (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Unique keys for sets
 
(...) No, the primary keys in that DB haven't changed since they were first created in April of 1998. When the DB is reborn out of its current form and into its new form, the old keys will be obsolete, but there will be a backward compatible (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)

12 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Database

 
LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 26 Nov 2024)
22 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR