Subject:
|
Re: Unique keys for sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 13:36:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1340 times
|
| |
|
|
The column order matters not to me, as long as it's there.
Mike
--
Mike Faunce
mike at faunce dot com
LUGNET #96
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:3869394a.194671379@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.database, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.database, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > > Ok, I can stuff those in one of the columns. Are they most helpful in
> > > column 1, 2, or 9?
> >
> > Separate column please, don't make me parse it out of an existing one..
> > that's my opinion.
>
> Oya definitely. I didn't mean overwriting one of the existing ones, sorry
> for the confusion. There are 8 columns now, so the new one would make • sense
> either at 1 (first), 2 (first), or 9 (last). IMHO, it makes the most • sense
> in column 1, but I don't know how that might disrupt current behaviors of
> code importing the table. If no one screams to the contrary, I'll stuff • it
> in column 1 and push the current columns 1-8 over to columns 2-9.
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Unique keys for sets
|
| (...) Oya definitely. I didn't mean overwriting one of the existing ones, sorry for the confusion. There are 8 columns now, so the new one would make sense either at 1 (first), 2 (first), or 9 (last). IMHO, it makes the most sense in column 1, but I (...) (27 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
