Subject:
|
Re: Unique keys for sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:22:06 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@%saynotospam%novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
279 times
|
| |
|
|
Separate column please, don't make me parse it out of an existing one..
that's my opinion.
As to what the keys are, I don't care, just as long as they are unique.
However, as I have pontificated before, you are right. The primary key
should be purely internal and have no business meaning.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Unique keys for sets
|
| (...) Oya definitely. I didn't mean overwriting one of the existing ones, sorry for the confusion. There are 8 columns now, so the new one would make sense either at 1 (first), 2 (first), or 9 (last). IMHO, it makes the most sense in column 1, but I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
