 | | Re: 6462 Piece Count
|
|
(...) Oops, I misspoke...yes, you are totally right (as usual). (...) Eventually I'd like to be able to track all 3. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 12-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 6462 Piece Count
|
|
(...) Hmm. I thought it went: 1) Box 2) Shop-at-Home Catalog 3) THEN we count. Note that box and S@H do NOT necessarily correlate. I track both of them, personally. -- joshua (26 years ago, 11-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II....Wait ...wait..!
|
|
(...) This has me thinking.... Is Hurriyet perhaps derogatory? Something not nice being said about your boss?? (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
(...) Right. One of the core ideas of LUGNET is to build up over time a comprehensive and integrated DB of everything, but another (and equally important) core idea is to unite all user-created websites, including helpful links to other related (...) (26 years ago, 11-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II....Wait ...wait..!
|
|
(...) OK, thanks, I made the correction... (...) Someday... --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Update info for Lugnet Database Volume III
|
|
Hi As a first word, I should clear some for the set inventories that I sent yesterday: - Any "unnecessary" extras are not included. These includes 1x1 rounds, gray/black pins, 1/2 pins, 3/4 pins, bushings and 1/2 bushings, 1x1 tiles, small lever (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 8226 Piece Count
|
|
The official LEGO Group piece count for the Mud Masher (8226) is 120. Duane (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture Yes/No in set listings
|
|
(...) Sounds like a fine idea to me. (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
Huw Millington wrote in message ... (...) what (...) Oh, I aimed to mention this actually. Not expert builders anyway. (...) Wow, it will be very nice...waiting for..:-) (...) least (...) it (...) expense (...) I'm very happy to hear this. Seeing (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II....Wait ...wait..!
|
|
(...) What a grammar:-( My boss was calling me while I was writing this last sentences, sorry. The name of the newspaper is "Sabah" not "Hürriyet" For the logo page, I'm sure you also thinking about adding all kind of logos and icons (from themes (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
(...) Millington's (...) Europe. In the UK they were 'Technical sets' until at least 1980. I am not sure what year they became Technic. (...) Thanks - I am planning a revamp of my '70's guide, based on ASP technology and better scans, so keep an eye (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
(...) Oh, technic was technic from the start in Europe. I suggest Huw Millington's lego pages, featuring 3 catalogs from 1977, 1978, and 1979, all from Europe. Nice informational site, especially very deep in 1970s. In one of my postings, I asked (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Picture Yes/No in set listings
|
|
Someone suggested adding a yes/no designator on the set listings at: (URL) the rightmost column in these listings now says Y or N (for Yes or No, respectively), indicating whether the corresponding set in the Pause/Lugnet database has a picture. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
(...) Hi! -- and thanks again! (...) Interesting -- these are given as TECHNIC in the catalog scan but as Expert Builder in the DB (currently). Did TECHNIC become TECHNIC in Europe/Asia before the U.S. Which is correct for 1982? (...) Neat-o! (...) (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Update Info for Pause (Is it Lugnet now?) Database Volume II
|
|
Hi Below is the excerpts from my 1982 German and 1984 Dutch Technic Catalogs: ---1982--- 0850, 0851, 0852, 0853 year: 1977 (I sent a better picture for 0850 also) 0854, 0855 year: 1978 (I sent a better picture for 0854 also) 0856, 0857 year: 1979 (I (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Lots more images of sets added to database
|
|
Todd Lehman writes: --snipped-- (...) --snipped-- (...) fantastic! i've been waiting for the duplo stuff to be input for quite awhile thanks to todd and all the hard workers..this resource is GREATLY appreciated! ..jg (26 years ago, 9-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to nettiquette?
|
|
(...) If you get permission first from the person(s) hosting the originals, yes. Otherwise, no, it's against nettiquette just to grab images from people without asking, even if LEGO owns the copyright and they don't. --Todd (26 years ago, 9-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Is it appropriate to nettiquette?
|
|
Hi I wonder If I could send pictures from other sites to the database, if they are not exist. Besides my own scans, I have another collection of lego set pictures from here or there (I don't remember the sites' names to give reference). Is it (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Lots more images of sets added to database
|
|
[Followups set to lugnet.admin.database] Whew! My fingers are tires, but I'm very happy! Thanks to Selçuk Göre, Irving De la Cruz, and others over the past week or so, there are now a zillion more set scans in the Pause/Lugnet set database. A (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, haven't you notice that yet? (was: Re: Update info for Pause database)
|
|
(...) I'm very sorry about that.:-( I had not wanted to annoy you. I had just wanted to be approved to go on, and yes I had just asked for a response. I was not sure about the info that I supplied was usefull or not, maybe you had all of them (...) (26 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
