Results 201 – 220 of 403.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
suggest
(score: 0.198)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.198)
|
|
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I really like the idea of adding .ebay, .brickbay, and .lego-direct (but call it .shop-at-home or .lsahs) categories. However instead of .swap and .swap.updates I would suggest .barter, .forsale, and .wanted. --Bill. (24 years ago, 10-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.198)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.198)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Are the web sales part of Shop at Home? I was originally going to suggest Shop at Home, but then I thought about the web sales. Of course the other question is where do the LICs, outlets, etc. fall? Deals there probably should be posted in the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
|
| (...) Ooh, Scott's sentence structure there is icky. There's some double negatavism going on, but the phrase "does it not belong" is usually intended to mean the same is "is it true that it belongs"... (...) One thing I strongly suggest you also add (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Sure. They can't hurt, and adding them gives you the coverage you need to toast the mostly obsolete dear-lego group. I'd suggest having them as just .rant and .rave instead of under the .lego.* hierarchy, to avoid implications that they're (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Wow. Well thanx for starting this discussion up Todd. It focuses into one thread what a lot of people have been talking about on and off for some time. I've read all the posts that are available and found about 15 that had a point in it that I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (My newsreader objected to my attempt to reply to Todd's original message, so I'm replying to a followup) (...) Lugnet.lego.{rant,rave,debate} get my vote. That makes it more clear that they are distinct from the non-lego groups. I'm not sure (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I agree with the comment that it shouldn't be under .lego. Otherwise, this sounds like a good way to deal with the type of comments you describe. (...) Ditto my comments about .rant. Plus, I'd recomend a name change. The term rave has certain (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I have mixed feelings about trying to apply order in matters of speech. I appreciate trying to make things orderly, and by segregating posts to areas they would be sought in would avoid flames from people who have to wade through messages (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Ok, some initial thoughts.... I was opposed to a .rant type group earlier, I now see that it could be valuable. One question though is how to get the ranting to move there. I don't think we can eliminate initial rants in response to an announcement, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I like the idea for all of these although I can see quite a bit of crossposting between .debate and the other 2. Maybe these groups should have restricted cross-posting? I.E. No cross posting at all or the only crossposting would be allowed if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| | Re: Announcement: Member pages
|
| (...) First, be careful to read the Lugnet Use Agreement. Anything you post on your "personal" lugnet page grants Lugnet *and* third-parties a non-exclusive license to reproduce, edit, post your material on the web and on any communications media. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.197)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.194)
|
|
| | Re: Lego for sale
|
| (...) Hmm - placing it is a tricky issue. I don't think it needs separate auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade divisions, but if you put it as a sub-division of the existing auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade groups then that's what it would be - split. The (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.194)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.194)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I think there is some overflow from .debate into other groups. I can't absolutely put my finger on it (in part because I realize that in part the Larry vs. Scott shouting match may have started outside of .debate, but I certainly see linkage (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.190)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
