Results 221 – 240 of 403.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| I *said* they had flaws and were thought starters... so you'll see a smiley behind every one of my responses, I'm trying to be funny in them. I suggest you post some ideas of your own, I'm trying to get some brainstorming going... (...) Why not? (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
suggest
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:>>Hey, that's a good idea- if you pay to become a Lugnet member, you're allowed (...) I'm not yet a member (mainly because most of my posting has been to OT rather than LEGO-specific contributions), (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I'll take some culpability here, I'm a sucker for trying to show up the clueless, and no matter how many times I swear it off, it's just too tempting... he's just so cluelessly annoying when he wants to be. (but he CAN be a good contributor (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | migrate private set list to public list
|
| Is there any easy way to migrate my private set list information in my membership webpage to the public list. I added it all as private (use to privacy on the NET) without thinking clearly about it :) Todd or whomever maintains the web forms, I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| Let me try to be clearer. (...) This is almost certainly what a lot of it indeed is. Using jump.cgi theoretically doubles the latency since two resolutions are required. But it's not ALL the delay, some surely, is at the server itself while it (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.189)
|
|
| | Re: Building manual on sale.
|
| (...) Todd, Are you going to finalize the change in TOS limiting all market activity to appropriate groups, or finalize that you won't be making the change? I hate to see people keep tripping over the TOS. Everyone else, I strongly suggest you read (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.187)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.187)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) No, I don't know that. Not based on what you said. If that's not how you feel, I suggest you stop obsessing over his disrespect for James, because that's certainly how it's sounding. (...) Fine, that was the final straw. But if he's learned (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
| (...) I let this one sit for a while, maybe should let it sit even longer. I think we do need to separate the issue of what to do about MM (which seems to be coming to a consensus, more or less) from the larger issue of whether Lugnet is (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Moulton writes: <snip> Well, it may make me sound like a jerk, but your apology rings false and I think you're lying. I don't believe a word of it. You obviously have a certain degree of skill at word craft, and at (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) I would suggest putting the following parts (marked by * *) in bold or in red. a. "Your *real-life* name will appear automatically ...." b. "In other words, *you must not conceal your real-life name* or *your real e- mail address* from other (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G23324.HEu@lugnet.com... (...) presumably (...) would (...) people (...) Well, Todd, I don't think anything is necessary, but it's your choice. Here's what I would suggest: Eliminate the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.184)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.184)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.184)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
