|
 | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) I think that if N can be defined by the users, this would work well. I personally think that if even one person rates a message that some information is better than none. However that's just me, and I think that new users would like to have N (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Currently, you're right. The rating system allows me to rate the "little guys" with good opinions up and the loud guys just blowing off steam down. Without ratings, whoever posts the most often gets seen the most. With ratings, I could (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: (Some snipping here, read Todd's post) (...) I think a combination of these could work well. The ratings could be hidden from public view, so that noone feels like they are being punished, and the server (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Did I read that yet?
|
| Todd, I've heard some requests for this before, and I'd like to revisit it. Can we get some sort of flag to show whether we've read a message or not? When I go to another computer, flush out my cache, switch from Netscape to IE, etc, I can't tell if (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Re: Did I read that yet?
|
| (...) OK, good. I understand that it would be some work and would like to see your time spent elsewhere as well. For example: (URL) much rather see this first. :) Ben Roller (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Is that your policy Todd? Can I talk all of the about the sets that I know about? If we find out about leaked information (from some other site for example), can we talk about that information in other casual conversations on Lugnet? Ben (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | When will Lugnet offer XXL, XXXL and XXXXL shirts?
|
| Cafepress.com is now offering shirts in these larger sizes! I was hoping to get a 2X Lugnet shirt, but noticed that we can still only buy the smaller sizes. Todd, when are you going to offer the larger sizes for Lugnet shirts? The Lugnet stores on (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Is Brickwise being updated?
|
| I was just noticing that Brickwise seems to be very out of date for some things. I was researching the price of the 3033 Blue Tub and noticed that the prices on Brickwise were all wrong. For example: The price shown for KBKids is too low by $1.10. (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
|
| | Re: Online Ideas Page...
|
| Amy Hughes writes: [mercifully deleted] IMHO, he set the Follup-To: correctly so all the responses would go to the right place. He was trying to let everybody know about a page that contains building ideas that could pertain to many different themes (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.411)
|
