Results 2101 – 2120 of 2225.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
 | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) That's hard to judge until a few months have passed. I have a very good feeling about this. (...) It's impossible to answer that question completely, since it's a fuzzy thing. However, we should trust that Brad and his people will do the right (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: Element search with fuzzy categories
|
| (...) Right-o. The real thingie (remember, the /dbtoys/elementsearch/ thingie is just a toy/prototype) will need to be smart like that, so it knows what's too little to return vs. what's too much. (...) Dunno. Maybe some of both, but probably few if (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: De Bouwsteen - LEGO club
|
| Todd, I didn't know you could read/understand Dutch. Again you amaze me (in the good sence!) Mark "Speaking and reading three languages myself" de Kock "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> on 10-06-99 19:14:23 To: lugnet.loc.nl@lugnet.com, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | ME TOO
|
| (...) Usually, I am not the buy who steps in for a "mee too" (as this is mostly useless On Lugnet when talking about MOCs or new products. However, as this is a really important subject for the entire philosophy of Lugnet, I had to emphasize Mikes (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) traffic (...) exist, (...) to (...) I think there is a "double standard" in that auction posts are singled out as particularly bad. This is not necessarily a bad thing (we also have a "double standard" on (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: CFD: lugnet.test
|
| Op een zekere dag, te weten Sat, 10 Oct 1998 04:06:32 GMT, klom lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) in het toetsenbord en schreef ons: (...) Talking about modesty. Hey Todd, you can do what you want with your own Newsserver! We all have to be eternally (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Moulton writes: By acting as a virtual punching (...) Matthew: Please give up the martyr routine. We are here because you have said some nasty things and violated the TOS. I feel just fine about myself today, thanks. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Newsgroup suggestion: lugnet.bit-bucket
|
| Sometimes it would be nice to have a news group to set followups to which would not actually accept posts, and would bounce an error back to the poster letting them know. This would be handy when you want to make a remark which you do not want any (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
| (...) Andy, I'm sorry there has been so much confusion about all of this. A large part of it is my fault. As of 14 Sep 2000 we intended to remove all mentions of member packets in the activation emails that go out. However, at that time, I missed a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| om> Distribution: X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Todd listed two improvements we could get by moving L-CAD to Lugnet: (...) I look forward to get them. (...) Me too. (...) Yes. Will you put a suggestion together? Here's a start: We suggest that (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
| (...) That would be cool. It would require keeping an index of yet-unconfirmed articles on a person-by-person basis (it doesn't currently track this) and just including that, or looking it up on-the-fly based on one of them. (...) I think it's (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| | Re: error message!
|
| Hi Todd, again you impressed me with a way more detailed answer than I expected and again I'm not entirely sure that I understood everything. As long as I could help supporting it's fine though :) . (...) (eleven) (...) the (...) Oh, yes! There are (...) (24 years ago, 19-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.404)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
