Results 1661 1680 of 2225.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| mail (score: 1.097) |
|
| | Re: newsticker
|
| (...) Works fine for me! Only one suggestion, if when you clicked on an article or do a search, it put the link destination or the results of a search in the current window instead of popping a new one. Thanks, guys! Steve Martin IndyLUG (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| mail (score: 1.097) |
|
|
| mail (score: 1.097) |
|
| | LUGNET by email
|
| I've been receiving every message twice for the past couple days. Is the problem on my end or is something wrong with LUGNET's mail sender? --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.097) |
|
|
| mail (score: 1.097) |
|
|
| mail (score: 1.096) |
|
|
| mail (score: 1.095) |
|
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
| I agree with everything said here Eric, (...) Truth be told, I only saw this recently, a few weeks ago, I meant to pass on my congrats through e-mail but forgot completely, sorry. :-( (...) Amen! when I was just getting started with showing off my (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| mail (score: 1.095) |
|
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
| (...) LUGNET doesn't generate enough funds to support itself. Todd and I carry the hosting, etc. and none of us see any money for what we do. All time is volunteered. Donations are always welcome and very appreciated. Which reminds me: currently, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.095) |
|
| | Slowness
|
| I authorised these on Friday (via e-mail) but they took until last night to appear: (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 8:04 PM) (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 7:53 PM) Scott A (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.094) |
|
| | E-mails from nowhere
|
| Just recently I've been receiving emails of messages I've posted to Lugnet marked as 'undeliverable mail'. Each takes the form of: ---...--- Your message To: lugnet.loc.uk@lugnet.com Subject: {{message title}} Sent: {{date of posting}} did not reach (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
| mail (score: 1.094) |
|
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
| "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:GMsBBr.AKv@lugnet.com... (...) Yes. I am getting the same thing. I can only assume it is something to do with the way lugnet forwards those messages. And that somehow ubisoft's mail (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
| mail (score: 1.094) |
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) Possibly. It's a very grey area. (OBDisclaimer: I'm only really arguing this to refine my understanding of what the ToU might mean in a fairly grey area.) (...) It is unreasonable to hold Lugnet's ToU to any authority beyond Lugnet, so the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| mail (score: 1.093) |
|
|
| mail (score: 1.093) |
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) Actually, I think you're both wrong. I just reveiwed the terms of use, and there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to have a valid one in your posting ID. So if you still feel that Larry violated your privacy, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| mail (score: 1.093) |
|
| | Re: edventures spam
|
| (...) the inv@peeron.com addy also doesn't post (afaik) - it was only mentioned *in* posts.. I spamcopped the edventures' mail each week i got them.. I think they stopped coming, but I don't know if it was because of the spamcopping or if i finally (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.092) |
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| My My, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.... I normally stay out of debate, I don't need anymore crap in my life, though you brought this into the public forum where I do read, and of course, I had to go back and look at the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.092) |
|
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
| (...) Note this request... (...) When I got it, there was no link there. I added the (Link?) so that if people have the link they would send it to me. Like I said, it's going to get waxed if I don't get a link for it soon. (...) This is a bit of an (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.092) |
|
| | Re: Unsubscribe from the LP newsletter
|
| (...) Arguably it is not. I don't think it's in the letter but it violates the spirit as it's a misuse of an email address. I apologised on forum and I will apologise again here. What I did was wrong, never mind that my motive was to be helpful, and (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| mail (score: 1.092) |
|
| | Re: edventures spam
|
| (...) Lugnet isn't spam free, although I *think* it's set up to discourage robots and other automated creepy crawlies. Anyone harvesting from Lugnet would have to at least subscribe, and grab the e-mail addys from message headers. This takes out a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 1.092) | More: Next Page >>
|