|
 | | Re: Did I read that yet?
|
| (...) OK, good. I understand that it would be some work and would like to see your time spent elsewhere as well. For example: (URL) much rather see this first. :) Ben Roller (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| | Did I read that yet?
|
| Todd, I've heard some requests for this before, and I'd like to revisit it. Can we get some sort of flag to show whether we've read a message or not? When I go to another computer, flush out my cache, switch from Netscape to IE, etc, I can't tell if (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: (Some snipping here, read Todd's post) (...) I think a combination of these could work well. The ratings could be hidden from public view, so that noone feels like they are being punished, and the server (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Currently, you're right. The rating system allows me to rate the "little guys" with good opinions up and the loud guys just blowing off steam down. Without ratings, whoever posts the most often gets seen the most. With ratings, I could (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) I think that if N can be defined by the users, this would work well. I personally think that if even one person rates a message that some information is better than none. However that's just me, and I think that new users would like to have N (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| | Re: A Question on Logging in and posting
|
| (...) That's correct -- the e-mail addresses entered on member pages aren't yet verified in a way that lets them be automatedly linked with posting. The single-group News-by-Mail subscription change that went up a few days ago, (URL) a break-out and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.237)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| | Re: New feature for messages?
|
| (...) It works better because there's only one server, which honors canceling. But on the other hand, with that many people reading LUGNET off the mail interface, I'd say canceling works _worse_ than on USENET. You can't cancel a message which has (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
| (...) It doesn't send you multiple copies of crossposted articles via e-mail. It's smart enough to know that if you're subscribed to both A and B, and someone crossposts to both A and B, to send you only one copy rather than two. (Of course in (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| | Re: A Question on Logging in and posting
|
| (...) As I understand it, there is currently no integration between the userid and the various cookies (news setup, mail subscription setup) and therefore, knowledge of who you are is not taken advantage of to any meaningful extent. As LUGNET grows (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
| (...) I imagine that when Todd gets around to making the web site able to keep track of which messages you've read, this feature will be available there too. But I don't think that's going to be available for a while. :( (This is one of many reasons (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
| (...) while this is a workaround and not a solution to the problem you're pointing out, is to read lugnet either with NNTP or through the news-by-mail. Both will only show you a message once, no matter how many groups it's crossposted to. :) Dan (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.236)
|
