Results 161 – 180 of about 2200.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| In lugnet.admin.terms, Marc Nelson, Jr. wrote: <snip> (...) In situations such as these, I often consult 'the oracle'... Judge Payton: "Judges are bound to interpret the Constitution within the strict parameters of the text itself. The Constitution (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|  
internet
(score: 0.605)
|
|
| |
|
internet, mail
(score: 0.604)
|
|
| |
|
internet, mail
(score: 0.604)
|
|
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
| [redirecting to .admin.general] (...) That's not too unusual -- email is one of the more unreliable forms of communication on the Internet (if you're looking for quick speed and that), although things almost always get delivered eventually. I just (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet, mail
(score: 0.603)
|
|
| | Pictures for Lugnet set database
|
| Hello, I found several set images, which are not available on the lugnet set database, in a catalog I have. It is about the next service packs: 1103, 1105, 1108, 1111, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1124 and 1125. How can I supply these (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.602)
|
|
| | Re: Serious E-mail issue resolved
|
| Hi again, this is to inform you that the mail system status is back to normal, remaining backlog being at approx. 100-120 messages which is the normal level we get with all the incoming spam. I have changed spam handling to the point that spam is (...) (17 years ago, 14-Nov-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.600)
|
|
| | Re: Serious E-mail issue resolved
|
| Since I think you may all want an update on this: While the mail server is actually done with working through the large backlog of incoming and outgoing mails, there are now some 15,000 mails waiting to be checked for spam and then processed by the (...) (17 years ago, 14-Nov-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.600)
|
|
| | Re: admin changes
|
| To quote Moe Szyslak, "Whaaa...aaa?????" What brought all this on? What are the implications for Lugnet? Thank you to all involved for their past and continuing service to the community. I know you've all worn a bunch of different hats, and please (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.599)
|
|
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
| Hello! (...) The issue is not the F-word itself in my as always more than humble opinion. It is just one syllable composed of three phonemes (the sounds /f/, /A/ and /k/) when you speak it out loud, using four graphemes (the letters 'f', 'u', 'c' (...) (20 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.599)
|
|
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
| (...) LUGNET has admins? I haven't ever seen evidence of that...I seem to remember a particular thread that had the F word in it over twenty times and it was never edited or deleted. 'The friendliest place on the Internet', eh? (20 years ago, 20-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Site Administration
|
| (...) I second this. I applied for membership over a month ago, paid my membership "fee" and have had numerous e-mails go completely unresponded to. All I would like is my membership number. I've followed all the steps expeditiously and accurately (...) (19 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.597)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.595)
|
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) <snip> (...) This is a huge point. Proofreaders. My perception of the group was that we were not able to agree or disagree with anything in the document, rather we were to simply point out syntax and grammar mistakes. Given that I openly don't (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.593)
|
|
| | Suggestion List Form Was somethign else
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote: <snip> (...) Form 22-31.A Request of Extended Service LUGNET Administration The party of the first, one David Koudys, respectfully requests that the party of the second, one LUGNET administration/enhancement (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.592)
|
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Parents who use the internet as a babysitter need to get their collective heads out of the clouds and get interested in what their kids are doing. The internet isn't safe, and it never will be without strict governmental control. And you know (...) (20 years ago, 23-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.589)
|
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) The ages I've seen posted by LUGNET users generally range in the 18+ range, but a few have posted ages in the 13-18 group, and a few others have posted in the under-13 group (I can think of at least one person from each of the non-adult age (...) (20 years ago, 25-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.589)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
