|
 | | Re: The decline of "From Bricks to Bothans"
|
| (...) I actually spoke to someone from FBTB about this very issue, here is how I see it (largely my opinion). When FBTB first hit it was an instant success because it scooped everybody for news and images of forthcoming sets. What then happened is (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|  
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: The decline of "From Bricks to Bothans"
|
| Hello. Let's start this at the top, shall we? Yes, I did indeed come out and tell everyone that if they were to wait that FBTB would bring home the best possible coverage of the SW line. And that obviously didn't happen. I dropped the ball. What (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: The decline of "From Bricks to Bothans"
|
| (...) First off Tim I apologize to Tim for my X-Files style conspiracy theories. I actually originally replied to Alfred’s post to defend FBTB, but now as I read my post it is clear that I focused more on my theories than on my praise of your site. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: windows ce
|
| "John Barnes" <barnes@sensors.com> wrote in message news:Gs3Dus.6z2@lugnet.com... (...) sent (...) he (...) him (...) bricks. (...) can (...) just thinking about it, one should be able to adapt the circuit to take a smaller battery add-on to use (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.palm)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Updated Gallery of DUPLO Printed Bricks
|
| (...) Here you go: (URL) 1x2x2: kecholiv.jpg: * on your list luggage.jpg: yours is described as red & blue suitcases, mine has dark grey and red lunch.jpg: * on your list toolbox.jpg: not mentioned on your list tools.jpg: * on your list wheat.jpg: (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Updated Gallery of DUPLO Printed Bricks
|
| (...) added them both to the gallery on BrickShelf and the database here on LUGNET. Between your contributions and Tony's I've been able to fill in a lot of the blank spots in the database. Greg (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Guq6vs.DKE@lugnet.com... (...) Lego bricks (...) that any (...) offensive (...) Lego(r) (...) of (...) inappropriate (...) picking a (...) they (...) satire. (...) a (...) as (...) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Solid Aluminum 2x4 Bricks!
|
| (...) This is what I was puzzled about. I thought they'd be particularly interested in the Aluminum brick keychains because they have a product just like it. So if no one seems to have a problem with making copies, why doesn't anyone make clones of (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Solid Aluminum 2x4 Bricks!
|
| (...) But you're missing MY point. Where's the cut off? When he makes 100? 150? 151? 756? 2002? Would it matter if he wasn't so well known in the AFOL community? I think it opens up a whole can of worms when you start selling the parts, vs. just (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| | Re: Solid Aluminum 2x4 Bricks!
|
| (...) Well, I was looking for more information important to makers of custom lego parts. I wanted to know where the "line" was - at what point TLC would come after someone. (I may not have used clear enough language in earlier posts). I was focusing (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
|
| |
|
bricks
(score: 1.008)
|
