|
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Alright, I think that most of us could buy into a new system of trains, if the right conditions were met. Absolutely must have conditions: 1) Enough torque in each motor to pull at least 10 cars 2) Compact component(s) that do not inhibit creativity (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|  
frequency
(score: 0.786)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.781)
|
|
| | Re: reorgs
|
| (...) So I got to do a show last weekend! On a tangent, I really missed doing shows and I had such a good time just talking to fans of the brick at this one. Anyway, I did a time lapse of the setup, and you can see the initial set up of the platform (...) (8 years ago, 31-Jan-19, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.774)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.773)
|
|
| | reorgs
|
| (...) Good luck, David. Are you going to try to finish your reorg? I recently did a reorg of some things in my set of display buildings/roads/track, and it helped a lot. I realised I had been doing the same workarounds for years instead of just (...) (8 years ago, 16-Jan-19, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.773)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.769)
|
|
| | Re: robosoccer ball problem...
|
| (...) It's not ideal for stock LEGO sensors I think, but it might be good to point out to them that the reason it blinks is to make things *easier*. With a source pulsing near a known frequency, ambient conditions are much easier to cancel out. (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.edu)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.764)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.763)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.760)
|
|
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
| (...) I'm afraid that I'm not a man of faith, so I can't accept your word without evidence, especially since your entire argument depends on it. If you intend to convince me (or anyone else who doesn't already agree with you), you'll need to find (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.751)
|
|
| | Re: PLEASE fix links
|
| This is actually one of the short list of reasons why my Lugnet frequency has dropped (besides obviously the biggee, time constraints). I am getting more and more frustrated with the broken links as more and more people are using the web interface (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.747)
|
|
| | NXC/NBC release news
|
| I have posted sourcecode and the win32 build of beta 25 for NBC/NXC. The Linux and Mac OSX binaries will be available later today. February 8, 2007 - NBC 1.0.1.b25 beta is available. - Fixes a string whitespace bug introduced in b22 - Fixes a (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.745)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.743)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.743)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Where did all the fun go?
|
| The last few weeks of activity here, sitewide, per the automation, have been the automation posting the activity stats. And that's it. There is one post a month about dinner. What we need is something stirring up some fun. (9 years ago, 27-Dec-17, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.739)
|
|
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.737)
|
|
| | Not eXactly C beta release news
|
| Today I am releasing a new beta of NBC and its highly popular high-level sister Not eXactly C (NXC). It is available via the NBC website ((URL) sure to also download the latest BricxCC test release for updated NXT support for both NBC and NXC ((URL) (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-06, to lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.736)
|
|
| | The Bloks Forum is Moving
|
| After years of foot-dragging and unresponsiveness, the admins of the Hyperboards server have summarily announced that Hyperboards is permanently shutting down on December 1, and all data will lost. The only surprise is that they gave us any warning (...) (9 years ago, 24-Nov-17, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.736)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) Mostly looks good in terms of the layout and features. But a few comments: Designy comments first: 1) I'm not sure I understand why you wanted to change the colors of the logo and the background? Personally, I find the new colors a little too (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.735)
|
