|
 | | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| (...) So, I like to listen. Where do you think I should post on lugnet? (be nice...I know, I know nowhere) Feel free to contact me toymuseum@hotmail.com I do not hide like them! I want to debate it, and resolve it, and move on. I have many other (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|  
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: LDForge - dev. plans and call for help
|
| (...) If you want a visual example on stipple, look at my LD4DStudio, it uses it for transparent stuff. In combination with depth buffer you don't need to sort anything just push the triangles and/or quad cords using glDrawElements and optionally (...) (16 years ago, 1-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Retro Mr. Robot
|
| This was actually the first robot I built following the end of my 2nd Dim Age, but I waited a few days to post cuz I think he's the best. I'm trying to build up some momentum and get a mention on Brothers Brick. Fingers crossed!! (URL) (16 years ago, 29-Mar-10, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | LDForge - dev. plans and call for help
|
| Hi folks, over the latter half of the year 2009 I've been planning and experimenting on the thought of a good CAD program for part authors. Now I'm unveiling my thoughts to the public, but this is not an announcement. It's too early for such. (...) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) The Flickr group gets a bit active when I cross-post discussion threads from here to it. There are people that don't use LUGNET but do use Flickr that do like to talk about LDraw. However LUGNET is definitely the central place for it. (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| (...) Indeed there are. The real fun comes when you start treating the first two as the third. (Not to be confused with treating the third as either of the first two of course :-) ). I think that this thread must be the longest (chronologically) on (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| Nick Tarleton wrote: > I don't know how fast the speaker can change frequency > or how soon it can be reacted to, so I can't get a bandwidth estimate. The telephone system can (at best) transmit at 56Kbaud (that's the speed of the fastest possible (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| I think what we can safely conclude from this thread is that: 1) there are lies, damned lies and statistics (I apparently have posted 287, 321 or 481 times in 2002) 2) no matter how you caculate it, Larry posted most :-) 3) people need to learn to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) I must admit that I hadn't realised it was so hard to post now. That, IMO, means we need somewhere new to discuss LDraw. If new people can't easily post in discussions then we are killing fresh discussion and that is a very bad move. (...) (17 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | LDraw Chat Room?
|
| (...) Yes, didn't I? Almost twice as long as your post... ;) (...) Isn't MLCad freeware? I didn't know that. But then again, I'm not an MLCad user. I don't know about a dedicated LDraw chat. Would it really be populated? There's nothing that stops (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Re: New Robot: V. I. Rooster
|
| Hey cool, I like the 4 parts that make the spine. Good to see you post again. Peace. Eric Sophie Legomaster Biomechanical Bricks (17 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.484)
|
|
| | Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| Howdy all. I woke up this morning to a pile of emails from people! Including one from the new store. So I can cut and paste too. So here is my response to the 1/2 truths of The Bricklink Forum. Funny, if I post this in bricklink (well I am not (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| Funny, I just checked the forums again. No one bothered to answer me here. They continue to attack people in their own little part of the world. So let me address these 'people', and make it a point to address the king of the haters club. 1.) I was (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| See Jon, you and Dan are tied at the hip. Whether you want to be or not, his meddling, in my eyes, has tarnished whatever you are trying to do. answer;Thanks, but I can read on my own. Interesting. So anytime anyone I know does anything on bricklink (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| So the 1st part of the Banned Dan website is done. Will spend some time doing spell checks. This idea was put in place when a local person was screwed by a business. That person was so mad he put up a sign accross from the business stating his case. (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| "Steve Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:3E171F4A.400050...ail.net... (...) :) (...) inventions (...) I'm (...) IR-connected (...) enough (...) would (...) processing. (...) legally (...) country. (...) at (...) Ok, if radio (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| (...) You could use an alternate firmware that can generate any tone, a custom modulation-demodulation protocol, and a condenser microphone soldered onto a sensor wire to send at reasonable bitrates for robot communication. Of course, it would take (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| | Re: 4x2ReVu: 7079 Drawbridge Defence
|
| ....REWRITE / FORMATTING.... !!! 4x2ReVu Stats !!! Rating: Six out of eight studs. Thumbs up for: Good structure, great model and assortment of figures makes for an excellent standalone set. Thumbs down on: I don't like the price (even considering (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.reviews, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.483)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.483)
|
