Results 1901 – 1920 of about 37000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: I remember this place...
|
| (...) LOL Snead! I thought you had pics of your dad's house or something! I just mis-read your post. You know where we all are silly goose! Now get to buildin' like we talked about! (17 years ago, 19-Apr-07, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|  
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Attempt at corner cafe
|
| I purchased the corner cafe directions and tried to build it with parts I had. Aside from colors, the problems that I encountered were mainly with windows. The first floor windows are 6 bricks tall unlike the 5 tall windows I have. Similarly the (...) (17 years ago, 22-Apr-07, to lugnet.town) !!
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: iCommand 0.5: Bluetooth API problem [Solved]
|
| Hi, Although I have not been able to work out the cause of the Bluetooth communication problem with the iCommand API mentioned in my last post, I have managed to code a 'bridge' DLL for my Java application to use the Lego's Fantom.DLL. The bridge (...) (17 years ago, 20-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Can't post via NNTP any more ...
|
| I have just rebuilt my Windows machine and reconfigured my news reader (OE) and now I am unable to post and I am not sure why. I don't think I did anything different than I have done in the past. I get this error when I try and post: Outlook Express (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | 4-8-15-16-23-42
|
| If you are not current with LOST Season 3 Episode 12, stop reading this and catch up! (URL) SPOILERS AHEAD PILOT B (URL) Sawyer reveals what happened to the Sky Marshal’s gun. Bearicide Ensues. “Dang right it’s a polar bear, and I just shot it!” (...) (17 years ago, 21-Apr-07, to lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: LDD - MOC Steam Engine inspired by Streamlined Hudson
|
| (...) Well, I'm no train expert, I only started building train MOCs a little over a year ago, but I'll be happy to share my opinions. And the number one thing you should do, in my opinion, is visit (URL). Ben Fleskes, a Lugnet member, sells custom (...) (17 years ago, 20-Apr-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: BNSF Loco available again?
|
| (...) Sorry for replying to my own post, but I just checked the LEGO site for Europe and discovered that the BNSF is showing available now as well as the Santa Fe Super Chief engine. CDC (18 years ago, 14-Apr-07, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Using arrays in LabView/NXT-G
|
| I've written a post regarding problems with array usage with (version 1.0) LabView compiler (i.e. what is currently used in NXTToolkit and NXT-G). Read it here: (URL) Ziv NXTasy.org (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) While murfling may not equate to cancelling or deleting a post, I find it hard to comprehend that anyone would not consider it a form of censorship. Though it has not been used widely on LUGNET, and as a result there are few examples of actual (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Brickworld 2007 - Call for Mindstorms competitors
|
| As part of Brickworld 2007 in Chicago, Jun 21-24, we are going to try to run at least four seperate Mindstorms events: *The ever-popular Sumo (4' ring, 2 lb limit, flipping strongly encouraged) *Line maze (find your way to the exit, as fast as (...) (17 years ago, 18-Apr-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.events, lugnet.robotics) !
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Disagree, especially in the event that the enforcement is on subjective issues. For example, Lugnet's TOS specifies that you shouldn't post that which is "profane" or "vulgar". Let's say the administration deems the word "evolution" as (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) In the case of a cancelled or deleted post, one can often still see the subject line and the author, but the content is gone forever. The reader can only imagine what horrible nastiness warranted such a scrubbing, and each reader will mentally (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | What Censorship Isn't
|
| When a privately-owned website enforces the TOS to which posters have explicitly agreed, that's not censorship. If it results in posts being deleted, hidden, altered, or flagged in some way, it still isn't censorship. Alternatively, if it is (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Sounds like different shades of the same color to me. (...) Ah, yes. A post that I made within hours of discovering JLUG is proof positive that I hold a lingering grudge these many months later. The logic is undeniable. (...) I didn't realize (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I said "Animal Farm" because I got sick of typing "1984." The intended joke was that you would scour every George Orwell book that you could get your hands on to find something, anything to support your argument. But (URL) it wouldn't be the (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Let me spell out the difference: on one you single out a post for the warning, on the other it covers the whole site. Understand now? (...) I believe there's ample proof that you do hold something against JLUG. You even went so far as to (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: Defining censorship
|
| (...) Agree! I set up the example to intentionally sound like the type of government that we would be more anxious to call "censoring". Arguably, I could've done without the lengthy applications and fingerprinting and such, and I would *still* call (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.413)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
