|
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
 | | Re: 1592 train
|
| (...) I'm with Mr. Wilson on this one.. Cool, in spirit, and well done to boot. Bravo. Enjoy it I certainly did. I am NEVER going to get to do one of these if I don't get moving, all the good ideas are getting taken! Nothing wrong with that of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | Re: Changing the subject... :-)
|
| (...) Well I am not sure if the blockbrake in this context is the lift hill drop or the mid track brake location but I had the front seat in the back car (they're 2 seat cars) on my middle ride, which was as close to the very back as my time budget (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | Changing the subject... :-)
|
| Apropos of nothing, ;-) did I tell you guys that I got to go to KBF on Tuesday nite? KBF was confused by my MA pass, the gate people had to check to see if they even knew what a "Michigans Adventure" WAS, and they gave me a special ticket that said (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | BBS systems
|
| BBS systems are possibly making a modest comeback, among the die hards that used to run them with lots of phone lines or call in to them a lot. With the internet and newer emulation software it's possible to run one that uses a telnet connection (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | Re: Layout samples
|
| (...) Crawl under is very very typical. Jump over is very very foolish. Bring a piece of carpet or rug to put at the spot where everyone crawls in/out... you'll be doing it more than you think and your knees will really appreciate it. (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | Re: MOB (was Re: Fan Thank You Letter)
|
| (...) A nit. Technically this is not true. They actually typically collect LESS than they pay out. (but only by a little) You can read quite a bit more about this topic here: (URL) particular see: (URL) in particular particular, the section headed (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.252)
|
|
| | Re: Set List Export?
|
| (...) Statistically, that is where most of mine are. I do exactly what Steve describes, I use Peeron to determine what set to part out for something (either in stock or purchased) as well as when it makes more economic sense to seek the part on (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| | Re: Fan Thank You Letter
|
| (...) Take a look at this link for some more thoughts on the economics of crime (including, particularly, theft) (URL) analysis does not quite square with yours. (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
| (...) No, but merely because I hadn't thought of it. I was just suggesting not moving .dear-lego (renamed or not) under .lego so that its content would not get mixed in when one viewed .lego from the web using the default interface. This is (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
|
| | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
| (...) Until the *default* web view (not just "an available view", I know it's available) is without subgroups folded in, I'd rather see .dear-lego kept off to the side and less traffic that belongs in .dear-lego misposted to .lego.direct Otherwise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.251)
|
