Subject:
|
Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:07:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Are you suggesting we put aliases on these pages:
> http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/
> http://news.lugnet.com/lego/
>
> to .dear-lego?
No, but merely because I hadn't thought of it. I was just suggesting not
moving .dear-lego (renamed or not) under .lego so that its content would not
get mixed in when one viewed .lego from the web using the default interface.
This is essentially the same argument I made against putting .announce.moc
under .announce... it may not be a popular argument, I suppose.
> Because that's a pretty good idea.
Indeed it is.
> Do you think the .lego charters could use a brief "normal version" along with
> the more detailed message about posting there? or would then no one read the
> longer message?
Yes! People should read both, but it is better that they read the brief
message than neither.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
| (...) Are you suggesting we put aliases on these pages: (2 URLs) .dear-lego? Because that's a pretty good idea. Do you think the .lego charters could use a brief "normal version" along with the more detailed message about posting there? or would (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
